When we've started PlantUML in 2009, the very first UML diagram type that we have addressed at that time was Sequence Diagrams.At the beginning, capabilities were very limited. The layout engine used for Sequence Diagrams was pretty simple, but this was enough to do basic diagrams. Then more and more people begin to use PlantUML and ask for new features. We add those features (group, activation, note, encompass...) by adding some code in the existing layout engine, but we did not change its roots. So you know the story : the code is getting more and more complex. It begins to be difficult to maintain. The initial simplicity is gone, because some initial architecture decisions were not good regarding the new capabilities. Moreover, some features (especially for parallel message, see pending wanted features) are almost impossible to implements with the current "Puma" architecture. This is the bad news. The good news is that we are willing to overcome those issues. So we've read many things about design patterns to define a better software archicture. And we need some courage too!
&) is a good idea. So we need feedback from the community: please use the Q&A forum, putting a Teoz tag in your questions. We would like to have a complete overview of what users wants to do, to be sure to design some Teoz engine able to handle all new features. Thanks for your feedback!
teozit is possible to add anchors to the diagram and use the anchors to specify duration time.
-Pcommand-line option to specify the pragma:
java -jar plantuml.jar -Pteoz=true
teozit is possible to have nested boxes for sequence: